All Discussions (28)
plan of action
it's terrific to see this group fill up with so many in such a short time!
thanks should go to gvn2fly_kristin who first challenged the notion that the china study was a pack of lies. when this matter was brought before freelee, she immediately starte
Campbell's response to Denise's flawed analysis of The China Study
I don’t have time to review every comment but did quickly scan the text. This analysis seems very impressive, especially given the writer’s young age with no training in nutritional science (see her web page).
She claims to have no biases–either for
Read more…Repository for relevant publications
I'd like to start this thread where we can keep a list of published articles related to diet. Please also list citations that critics of Campbell have included in their arguments. My plan is to obtain the articles, read them, summarize, and (hopefu
Read more…I really question Denise's maths...
I read part of Denise's on the China Study, and I quickly came to her quick note on stats:
A quick note on stats
Not a math whiz? No problem. The stuff here should be pretty straightforward, but in case you’re rusty or simply allergic to numbers, here’
Read more…A Cancer Epidemiologist refutes Denise Mingers China Study Claims due to incorrect data analysis
failed to take into account other disease-causing variables (increased
Hepatitis B and schist
My response to Denise's acceptance of my offer to assist
Its purpose was to re-articulate the limitations of her analysis, but also to inform. Good science should prevail, after all.
Hi Denise,
As promised, I'm posting my response to your email [yes, she emailed me] on your site. You asked that I
Dr Colin T Campbell's 2006 Rebuttal of the critics reviews...
Sales of our book, "The China Study…", co-authored by me and my son, Tom, have exceeded our expectations. With no formal public relations campaign, no recipes, no menus and many scientific references, we were cautioned by some in the publishing world
Read more…